Incomplete Games

So as I mentioned with KF2, I'm involved in what has to be my first or second "early access" game I've ever had. I was aware things would change, but I wasn't 100% prepared for how limited it was. Let's be fair and honest for a moment, I'm a full-time grad student, part time employee and I just shelled out $40 for an incomplete game. I'm the kind of cheap bastard gamer that buys hoards of games on the Steam sales, bundles, or just naturally waits for prices to go down. The last game I bought at launch was Borderlands 2 and I never doubted my decision there as my 500+ hours will attest to--for the record, no I've still never beaten it 100% or maxed a character yet.

Getting your "money's worth" is something that always comes up in these discussions because let's face it--you, me, us and the rest of the 99% don't always have all the money we want for all the things that interest us and rarely if ever have the time to enjoy them as much as we would like. Therefore it's a very personal question on whether and how much something is worth to you. I believe upon completion I will be spending well worth my money in game with friends or on my own in the future, I support what they're doing as a game developer, and I have a better than chance they WILL complete this game. Oh yeah, if you weren't aware, all these Alpha/Beta versions, early access, or pre-launch games are never guaranteed. You find them on Steam and sites like Kickstarter and IndieGoGo trying to come up with funds that they don't have or try to drum up interest in games to justify whatever financial support that are getting. I assume Steam vets them sufficiently, but there's 0 accountability on crowd-funded projects to ever be published. It's more of a gamble, one I've participated in a couple of times, but usually only after them meet their requested goals and I'm personally satisfied with what appears to be coming out of there. Two I can readily recall are Banner Saga & Star Citizen. Banner Saga was made by a start-up developer in Austin, TX and this was to be there first big release. I remember being captured first by their artwork and style, this hook led to me watching the video where they showcased a lot of the game already completed (another thing to consider as it can take years to develop games depending on where they are in production). They laid out clear points they wanted to achieve with this money they were asking for and I took the gamble. I enjoyed it and will likely review it at some point, even met one of the lead writers at PAX South earlier this year. Star Citizen is the newest brainchild of the man who most flight simulator or sci-fi games will know by name alone: Chris Roberts. This guy is behind some of the most best selling series in early PC gaming: Wing Commander. His presentation was a testament to what he WANTED to do, very little was flushed out at the time beyond concepts and some very primitive set-ups. But he was making the game regardless and shelled out more informative updates as their project flew thru record-breaking pledges. This baby, whenever it does come out will need me to upgrade to a new rig so I'm not having to run it on minimum settings, but looks jaw-dropping amazing.

Timetables are another thing I briefly mentioned, but are VERY important this day in age with all the instant gratification we've come to expect with the many facets of our lives. Some of these games are completed and just need a bit of polish and fine tuning. These early access period give development teams a great opportunity to stress-test their equipment and play-test their game as a whole. Forums and communities that stem from these experiences are always a mixed bag, but you can usually find quite a few people WANTING to help make the game a better thing. Other projects are just at the treatment or early-on in a design phase, this will take a considerable amount of time to complete and you need to at least be aware of that when you join in--money you're giving away NOW may not get you anything for months or even YEARS down the line. Usually a good team will keep the patrons and backers regularly hyped with updates or teases and announcements with what they're working on. The best ones will give you a calendar that you can follow--even if it changes as the process advances, just knowing they have a measurable goal is a comfort to those of us waiting in the virtual lists.

Beta-testing is a whole other circumstance altogether. For the record I have been involved with 3 closed betas. I was very big into League of Legends and a few years ago a company premiered a new MOBA-style game at QuakeCon entitles SMITE and asked me to be one of the many people trying it out. Many virtual forms were required and had to fill out reports and check lots of tedious little things there, and I didn't really enjoy the game anyway. So after a couple of weeks I filed my last report and moved on. The other one I wish to speak of is a mass-beta event, these are a lot more common closer to a launch. I got into the Elder Scrolls Online with a newsletter all-call to gamers who were interested in trying it out before launch. Only certain portions of the game were available with quests or travel points specifically bugged or left incomplete to keep everyone corralled where the developers wanted us. I participated in 3 of these weekends and filled out a single, short form each. There are some lucky bastards who get paid to play games and critique or identify flaws in the industry. I am not, nor have ever been. I also don't like quite a few genres so I probably wouldn't enjoy it as much as I might think.

If anyone has anything related they'd like to talk about, ask away. These discussion posts are just that to see if there's any interest.